Skip to main content
· 8/15/1997

John A. Hyde v. Daniel Small and Bill Hedgepath

Citations

  • 123 F.3d 583
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21566
  • 1997 WL 465651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that Farrar can apply when plaintiff receives a small monetary award (in. that case, $500) greater than $1
  • ruling that Farrar can apply when plaintiff receives a small monetary award (in that case, $500) greater than $1
  • explaining that a plaintiff likely needs “decreed declaratory or injunctive relief” or some other substantial benefit for fees when only nominal damages are awarded
  • discussing the difficulty of defining “nominal,” i.e. “the equivalent of losing”
  • where a plaintiff wins only nominal damages, a reasonable fee is “especially likely to be zero” unless the case establishes important precedent or awards equitable relief
  • “[w]hen the civil rights plaintiff aims small, and obtains an amount that is significant in relation to that aim [it need not reach the target], he is prima facie entitled to an award of fees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Cudahy, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.