Skip to main content
· 10/4/1982

Johanson v. California

Citations

  • 459 U.S. 853
  • 103 S. Ct. 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to obtain attorney opinion work product, plaintiff must show a compelling need under Rule 26(b)(3)
  • A litigant’s pleading of a claim or defense to which attorney-client communications are relevant does not, by such pleading alone, waive the attorney-client privilege.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.