Johanna McDonough v. Anoka County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in total, there were 178 accesses of Johanna Beth McDonough’s information by 46 different agencies or businesses between November 2, 2008 and November 8, 2008
• noting that the application of a statute of limitations is a question of law
• noting that “the 4 This distinguishes § 1591(a), which carries a minimum sentence of fifteen years’ imprisonment, see § 1591(b)(1), from otherwise similar sex crimes. For example, 18 U.S.C. § 2421(a
• stating that, at the pleading stage, there \is no requirement for direct evidence\
• \[F]erreting out the most likely reason for the defendants' actions is not appropriate at the pleadings stage.\ (quoting Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 648 F.3d 452, 458 (6th Cir. 2011))
• “In the context of the DPPA, the word ‘obtain’ unambiguously includes access and observation of the data.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).