Johan Sumolang v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding because the IJ and BIA each made a legal error that led each to exclude directly relevant evidence
• affirming the BIA’s finding that the petitioner’s ignorance of the one-year filing deadline did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance
• “The withholding of removal statute makes no . . . allowance for derivative beneficiaries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).