Joffe v. United California Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was sufficiently foreseeable that the drawer of a check (that was otherwise regular but had some unusual features
• holding that UCC § 3-418 precludes liability on theories of negligence and CT Page 9675 conversion
• holding that it was sufficiently foreseeable that the drawer of a check (that was otherwise regular but had some unusual features) would be harmed by a depositary bank’s acceptance of the check with a missing indorsement, and permitting the drawer to sue the bank for negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).