Joel v. Duet Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sanctions allowed under OCGA § 9-11-37 (b)ifthe trial court has previously denied a motion for a protective order and ordered discovery under OCGA § 9-11-26 (c)
• sanctions were warranted, in the absence of a motion to compel, where party failed to comply with order to appear for deposition and produce documents
• sanctions were warranted, in the absence of a motion to compel, where party failed to comply with order to appear for deposition and produce documents
• sanctions were warranted, in the absence of a motion to compel, where party failed to comply with order to appear for deposition and produce documents
• sanctions allowed under OCGA § 9-11-37 (b) if the trial court has previously denied a motion for a protective order and ordered discovery under OCGA § 9-11-26 (c)
• defensive pleadings struck where party only partially complied with court order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).