Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/22/1998
Joel Erik Thompson, Ltd. v. Holder
Citations
- 965 P.2d 82
- 192 Ariz. 348
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the issuance of the mandate, the equivalent to Nevada's remittitur, ends the tolling period provided by Arizona's litigation malpractice tolling rule
- holding that the issuance of the mandate, the equivalent to Nevada's remittitur, ends the tolling period provided by Arizona's litigation malpractice tolling rule
- holding that the issuance of the mandate, the equivalent to Nevada's remittitur, ends the tolling period provided by Arizona's litigation malpractice tolling rule
- ‘When legal malpractice occurs in the course of litigation, the malpractice claim does not accrue, and the statute of limitations does not start to run, until the appellate process in the underlying litigation is completed or is waived by a failure to appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fidel, Ehrlich, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fritzeen v. GravelSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-05-23· cited 13×
- Glaze v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-10-17· cited 7×
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. GerrardNevada Supreme Court· 2018-12-27· cited 5×
- Hayenga v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-02-12· cited 3×
- Celaya v. StewartD. Arizona· 2010-02-25· cited 2×
- BRANCH BANKING & TR. CO. VS. GERRARD, ESQ.Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-12-27
- Cooper v. Favour, Weaver, Moore, Wilhelmsen & Schuyler, P.A.Ninth Circuit· 2001-07-17
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-17· cited 78×
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-07-06· cited 60×
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-05· cited 32×
- Joan Woodruff v. Hewitt P. Tomlin, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 1975-02-21· cited 31×
- Skousen v. NidyArizona Supreme Court· 1961-11-29· cited 17×
- Cruz v. Lusk Collection AgencyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-03-30· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.