Joel Erik Thompson, Ltd. v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the issuance of the mandate, the equivalent to Nevada's remittitur, ends the tolling period provided by Arizona's litigation malpractice tolling rule
• holding that the issuance of the mandate, the equivalent to Nevada's remittitur, ends the tolling period provided by Arizona's litigation malpractice tolling rule
• holding that the issuance of the mandate, the equivalent to Nevada's remittitur, ends the tolling period provided by Arizona's litigation malpractice tolling rule
• ‘When legal malpractice occurs in the course of litigation, the malpractice claim does not accrue, and the statute of limitations does not start to run, until the appellate process in the underlying litigation is completed or is waived by a failure to appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).