Skip to main content
· 2/16/1995

Joel Charchenko v. City of Stillwater

Citations

  • 47 F.3d 981
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2870
  • 1995 WL 61432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine is broader than claim and issue preclusion because it does not rely on final judgments
  • noting that \Rooker-Feldman is broader than claim and issue preclu- sion because it does not depend on a final judgment on the merits\
  • finding that a “claim is inextricably intertwined if the federal claim succeeds only to the extent that the state court wrongly decided the issues before it.”
  • looking to the relief requested by the plaintiff in determining whether his claim is barred
  • looking to the relief requested by the plaintiff in determining whether his claim was barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine
  • conducting separate analyses and finding claims barred by Rooker-Feldman but not res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magill, Gibson, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.