· 9/15/1993
Joe Woods v. James H. Thieret and Dennis Hasemeyer
Citations
- 5 F.3d 244
- 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1206
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24170
- 1993 WL 348848
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that giving a limiting or curative instruction regarding use of shackles is an “appropriate method[] of eliminating potential prejudice”
- “taking steps to reduce the visibility of restraints and the giving of limiting or curative instructions dealing with the shackles are appropriate methods of eliminating potential prejudice”
- dismissing in part the appeal of pro se plaintiff for failure to provide transcript
- emphasizing judge’s personal responsibility for deciding independently about restraints during trials
- emphasizing judge’s personal responsibility for deciding independently about restraints during trials
- emphasizing judge’s personal responsibility for deciding independently about restraints during trials
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Coffey, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.