Skip to main content
· 9/15/1993

Joe Woods v. James H. Thieret and Dennis Hasemeyer

Citations

  • 5 F.3d 244
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1206
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24170
  • 1993 WL 348848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that giving a limiting or curative instruction regarding use of shackles is an “appropriate method[] of eliminating potential prejudice”
  • “taking steps to reduce the visibility of restraints and the giving of limiting or curative instructions dealing with the shackles are appropriate methods of eliminating potential prejudice”
  • dismissing in part the appeal of pro se plaintiff for failure to provide transcript
  • emphasizing judge’s personal responsibility for deciding independently about restraints during trials
  • emphasizing judge’s personal responsibility for deciding independently about restraints during trials
  • emphasizing judge’s personal responsibility for deciding independently about restraints during trials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Coffey, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.