Joe Robertson and Addrue Robertson v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a claim alleging a taking of an avigation easement because the “[plaintiffs have not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the interference with the use and enjoyment of their property was increased to any significant extent” when new planes were introduced on the base
• dismissing a claim alleging a taking of an avigation easement because the “[p]laintiffs have not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the interference with the use and enjoyment of their property was increased to any significant extent” when new planes were introduced on the base
• dismissing a claim alleging a taking of an avigation easement because the “[plaintiffs have not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the interference with the use and enjoyment of their property was increased to any significant extent” when new planes were introduced on the base
• land used for grazing cattle and producing oil

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).