Joe Neil Glenn, Jr. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor’s argument calling defendant charged with single count of distributing marijuana “drug dealer” was inflammatory and “stepped over the boundaries of permissible advocacy”
• conviction reversed where unwarranted characterization of defendant as drug dealer saturated entire case from beginning to end
• remarks that defendant was “entrepreneur” and “common street level dealer” unsupported by evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).