Joe Ivory Johnson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in the context of limitation periods in habeas statute, that a Rule 33 motion for new trial was a collateral challenge separate and distinct from the direct appeal, and holding that a second notice of appeal was required
• “[A] delayed Rule 33 motion is a collateral challenge separate from the direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).