· 12/3/1981
Joe Flynn Rare Coins Inc. v. Stephan
Citations
- 526 F. Supp. 1275
- 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16018
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- argument that held goods would diminish in value is speculative; depending on market conditions, the value of the goods could either increase or decrease during the holding period
- “[A]ny diminution of value in the goods is speculative. In a declining market, the value could diminish. In a rising market, the dealer will benefit from the ten-day holding period.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saffels
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.