Skip to main content
· 12/3/1981

Joe Flynn Rare Coins Inc. v. Stephan

Citations

  • 526 F. Supp. 1275
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • argument that held goods would diminish in value is speculative; depending on market conditions, the value of the goods could either increase or decrease during the holding period
  • “[A]ny diminution of value in the goods is speculative. In a declining market, the value could diminish. In a rising market, the dealer will benefit from the ten-day holding period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saffels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.