Joe B. Shaner and Cynthia K. Shaner v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that loan contingent on agency's \broad discretion in determining whether to approve [the] application\ was \too speculative to be considered a property right\
• recovery denied under Ohio law, noting that “Good Samaritan Doctrine is limited to physical harm,” and citing §323
• ‘[A] Bivens action may be brought only against individual federal officials, not against the United States.”
• “[T]he borrower and lender stand at arm’s length while negotiating the terms and conditions of the loan and no fiduciary duty exists at this stage of the relationship . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).