Joe Aulston and Lola Aulston v. United States of America, and Shell Western E & P, Intervenors-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the reasoning of Park Cty. Res. Council to an FLPMA claim regarding mineral leases
• disregarding internal memoranda in determining the position of the Interior Department
• disregarding internal memoranda in determining the position of the Interior Department
• rejecting argument that use of \gas\ in mineral reservation evinced a specific congressional intent to exclude carbon dioxide from a gas reservation, when inclusion comported with general intent of statute and value of carbon dioxide was not appreciated at time of mineral reservation
• rejecting argument that use of \gas\ in mineral reservation evinced a specific congressional intent to exclude carbon dioxide from a gas reservation, when inclusion comported with general intent of statute and value of carbon dioxide was not appreciated at time of mineral reservation
• rejecting argument that use of “gas” in mineral reservation evinced a specific congressional intent to exclude carbon dioxide from a gas reservation, when inclusion comported with general intent of statute and value of carbon dioxide was not appreciated at time of mineral reservation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).