Joe A. Cunningham v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the government was not required “to prove that appellant assaulted, impeded and interfered with the Immigration officer,” even though that was the language in the indictment because “only one of the several allegations linked in the conjunctive” needed to be proved
• wherein indictment, alleging in the language of the statute impeding and interfering, held not duplicitous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).