Jody O'Neil Harrison v. Grantt Culliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a denial of a pro se state prisoner’s motion for discovery was not an abuse of discretion, in prisoner’s § 1983 action
• holding that the failure to dispute facts and present evidence to the contrary yielded an independent basis for summary judgment
• holding that to hold a supervisor liable, the plaintiff must establish that the widespread abuse “puts the responsible supervisor on notice of the need to correct the alleged deprivation”
• holding that a prison official can be liable for the flow of weapons into a prison if the official has “actual notice of a flagrant, persistent pattern of violations”
• holding that the prison warden could not be held liable despite evidence of four assaults in a specific location over three years because such evidence was “hardly sufficient” to demonstrate that the prison was one “where violence and terror reign”
• holding that the prison warden could not be held liable despite evidence of four assaults in a specific location over three years because such evidence was “hardly sufficient” to demonstrate that the prison was one “where violence and terror reign.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).