Jocson v. Crabb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[w]hile the parties would be wise to seek direction from the court when they disagree about an ad litem’s role, it could be expensive and disruptive if they had to pursue every disagreement to a hearing throughout the pretrial process”
• defendants objected to ad litem’s fee where ad litem testified he had standard practice of billing 0.25 hour for each document he reviewed, even if it was only a notice of deposition or letter containing a single sentence
• noting guardian ad litem is not attorney for the child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).