Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 4/1/2002
Jocoy v. Jocoy
Citations
- 349 S.C. 441
- 562 S.E.2d 674
- 2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 50
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that while the standard of review in equity cases permits an appellate court a broad scope of review, the court does not disregard the findings of the master-in-equity, who saw and heard the witnesses and was in a better position to evaluate their credibility
- “In our view, the better approach is that no gift is presumed to a son-in-law or daughter-in-law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connor, Hearn, Shuler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-01-22· cited 749×
- Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-26· cited 94×
- Hayne Federal Credit Union v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-11· cited 88×
- Lollis v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-06· cited 51×
- Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 46×
- Varap v. VarapAppellate Court of Illinois· 1966-11-03· cited 36×
- Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama· 1958-05-29· cited 31×
Other cases named Jocoy v. Jocoy
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.