Jobin v. Lalan (In Re M & L Business MacHine Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n a Ponzi scheme the only inference that a court can make is that the Debtor had the requisite intent to hinder, delay or defraud under § 548(a)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).