Joann Aamot v. Robert L. Kassel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Rule 41(a)(1) notice is “self-effectuating”
• holding that a Rule 41(a)(1) notice is “self-effectuating”
• holding that a Rule 41(a)(1) notice is “self-effectuating”
• holding that a Rule 41(a)(1) notice is “self-effectuating”
• holding language of Rule 12(b) is directed at the court and conversion of a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment takes place at the discretion of the court when the court decides not to exclude extraneous matters
• affirming district court dismissal of action when the plaintiff filed her dismissal after the defendant filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).