Jo v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well-established in this district that a plaintiff cannot amend [her] Complaint in an opposition to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment.”
• “Although Plaintiff clearly values his own credentials and experiences, a plaintiff’s subjective assessment of his own record is largely irrelevant.”
• “It is well- established in this district that a plaintiff cannot amend his Complaint in an opposition to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment.”
• “Although Plaintiff clearly values his own credentials and experiences, a plaintiff’s subjective assessment of his own record is largely irrelevant.”
• “Although Plaintiff clearly values his own credentials and experiences, a plaintiff’s subjective assessment of his own record is largely irrelevant.”
• 42 U.S.C. § 1983 allows equal-protection claims against District

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).