Skip to main content
· 9/23/1997

Federal Case

Citations

  • 125 F.3d 656
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting in the context of a civil rights action that highway checkpoints are reasonable under the Fourth Amendment if they maintained a proper balance between the Brown factors
  • no evidence officers enjoyed undue discretion by asking questions unrelated to determining whether drivers were intoxicated
  • “Under the guidelines, the Sheriff’s Department was to consult with the prosecuting attorney and local municipal judges before implementing the sobriety checkpoint program.”
  • injury-in-fact, required for standing, is actual or imminent invasion of legally protected interest, which is both concrete and particularized to plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.