· 9/23/1997
Federal Case
Citations
- 125 F.3d 656
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting in the context of a civil rights action that highway checkpoints are reasonable under the Fourth Amendment if they maintained a proper balance between the Brown factors
- no evidence officers enjoyed undue discretion by asking questions unrelated to determining whether drivers were intoxicated
- “Under the guidelines, the Sheriff’s Department was to consult with the prosecuting attorney and local municipal judges before implementing the sobriety checkpoint program.”
- injury-in-fact, required for standing, is actual or imminent invasion of legally protected interest, which is both concrete and particularized to plaintiff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.