Skip to main content
· 1/14/1994

Jo-Ann's Launder Center, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

Citations

  • 854 F. Supp. 387
  • 29 V.I. 186
  • 1994 WL 223045
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, absent any duty owed by a lender bank to borrowers independent of a contractual duty of reasonable care in handling their loan, the borrowers’ tort remedies could not be maintained in addition to those established under contract itself
  • holding that, absent any duty owed by a lender bank to borrowers independent of a contractual duty of reasonable care in handling their loan, the borrowers’ tort remedies could not be maintained in addition to those established under contract itself
  • stating that there is a presumption that a bank’s loan officer and a client operate at arms-length and the parties each acted in their own interest.
  • recognizing a cause of action under contract law, per the Restatement, “for 149 breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in a loan contract between a lender 150 and a borrower”
  • “A fiduciary relationship may arise if the lender gains substantial control over the borrower’s business affairs, such as participating in the borrower’s day-to-day management.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.