J.M.I. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an email indicating the EEOC “has 24 reached a decision” is insufficient to establish notice of a claimant’s right to sue because 25 there are “important, non-final EEOC decisions that would not trigger a ninety-day tolling 26 period”
• noting that the EEOC acknowledged that the problem with the portal was a “known issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).