Skip to main content
· 10/17/2012

J.M. v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development and T.C.

Citations

  • 975 N.E.2d 1283
  • 2012 WL 4905908
  • 2012 Ind. LEXIS 850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court’s practice “going forward will be to keep the [ ] parties confidential only if they make an affirmative request”
  • noting that the court’s practice “going forward will be to keep the[] parties confidential only if they make an affirmative request”
  • explaining that on appellate review the trial court’s judgment will be affirmed if sustainable on any theory or basis found in the record
  • \[O]n appellate review the trial court's judgment will be affirmed if sustainable on any theory or basis found in the record.\
  • denial of benefits affirmed where employee refused to report time missed as directed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David, Dickson, Rucker, Massa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.