Skip to main content
· 3/6/2017

J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.

Citations

  • 214 Cal. Rptr. 3d 494
  • 389 P.3d 1242
  • 2 Cal. 5th 648
  • 2017 WL 875829
  • 2017 Cal. LEXIS 1609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “market power alone” is not sufficient to invalidate a contract voluntarily entered into
  • finding that a complaint specifying that the term “Defendants” referred to “each and every Defendant” provided sufficient notice
  • finding no conspiracy where plaintiffs were auto body shops claiming that insurance companies were pressuring them to lower their prices and alleging that non-State Farm insurance companies would not pay rates higher than State Farm’s publicly available rates
  • first citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570; and then citing /gbal, 556 U.S. at 678
  • first citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570; and then citing Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678
  • “The alleged boycotting methods are not so idiosyncratic that they suggest conspiracy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.