· 3/6/2017
J.M. v. Huntington Beach Union High School Dist.
Citations
- 214 Cal. Rptr. 3d 494
- 389 P.3d 1242
- 2 Cal. 5th 648
- 2017 WL 875829
- 2017 Cal. LEXIS 1609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “market power alone” is not sufficient to invalidate a contract voluntarily entered into
- finding that a complaint specifying that the term “Defendants” referred to “each and every Defendant” provided sufficient notice
- finding no conspiracy where plaintiffs were auto body shops claiming that insurance companies were pressuring them to lower their prices and alleging that non-State Farm insurance companies would not pay rates higher than State Farm’s publicly available rates
- first citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570; and then citing /gbal, 556 U.S. at 678
- first citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570; and then citing Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678
- “The alleged boycotting methods are not so idiosyncratic that they suggest conspiracy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corrigan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.