Skip to main content
· 12/1/2017

J.L.S. v. State

Citations

  • 240 So. 3d 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was a genuine issue of material fact concerning when the medical malpractice statute of limitations began to run
  • holding that a question of fact existed as to whether knowledge of a complication from a root canal or advice from another dentist triggered the limitations period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.