J.L. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State cannot rely on hearsay testimony when the defense properly objects to its introduction, when proving the amount of loss attributable to stolen property
• reversing because value was based only on hearsay evidence, to which defendant properly objected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-01· cited 3×
• J.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-28· cited 2×
• Garcia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-22
• Cintron v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-13
• W.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hawthorne
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 121×
• Louis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-31· cited 5×