J.K. v. Department of Children & Families

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no Doyle violation when there was no comment or question by the prosecutor about a defendant’s postarrest silence but instead there was an inadvertent reference to the defendant’s silence by a witness
• holding that there was no Doyle violation when there was no comment or question by the prosecutor about a defendant's postarrest silence but rather an inadvertent reference to the defendant's silence by a witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).