Skip to main content
· 5/2/2014

J&J Sports Productions, Incorporated v. Mandell Family Ventures, LLC

Citations

  • 751 F.3d 346
  • 2014 WL 1757307
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “statutory framework of the FCA as a whole also confirms that § 605 does not apply to Defendants' receipt of cable communications”
  • holding that section 605 does not apply to 3 Case: 19-20458 Document: 00515326079 Page: 4 Date Filed: 02/28/2020 No. 19-20458 “communications by wire from [a] cable system”
  • stating that § 553 only covers the receipt of cable communications, while § 605 only covers the receipt of communications through the air via radio
  • explaining that claims arising under the Communications Act have a three-year statute of limitations
  • reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment because § 605 “prohibited only the unauthorized receipt of radio or satellite communications” and was thus inapplicable
  • denying summary judgment for the plaintiff under the same circumstances as in Schmalz

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Haynes, Higginson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.