Skip to main content
· 7/8/2003

J.J. Industries, LLC v. Bennett

Citations

  • 71 P.3d 1264
  • 119 Nev. 269
  • 119 Nev. Adv. Rep. 33
  • 2003 Nev. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • including as an element of intentional interference, “intentional 18 acts intended or designed to disrupt the contractual relationship”
  • listing as one of the elements of a tortious interference claim \an intentional act[ ] intended or designed to disrupt the contractual relationship\
  • requiring a valid and existing contract to establish an intentional interference with contractual relations claim
  • requiring a valid and existing contract to establish an intentional interference with contractual relations claim
  • requiring a valid and existing contract to establish an intentional interference with contractual relations claim
  • requiring a valid and existing contract to establish an intentional interference with contractual relations claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agosti, Rose, Maupin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.