Jividen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence as irrelevant at new trial hearing involving ineffective assistance of counsel claim
• appellant failed to call potential witnesses at the new trial hearing and thus could not show prejudice resulted from their absence at trial
• appellant failed to call potential witnesses at the new trial hearing and thus could not show prejudice resulted from their absence at trial
• where a missing witness does not testify at the motion for new trial hearing, no evidence supports the claim that the witness is crucial to the defense or that the witness could have been located

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).