Skip to main content
· 6/28/2007

Jivan v. Economy Inn & Suites

Citations

  • 260 S.W.3d 281
  • 370 Ark. 414
  • 260 S.W.3d 260
  • 2007 Ark. LEXIS 402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Conner’s case has remained under submission for so long because of the need for en banc consideration and because we hoped the supreme court’s decision in Economy Inn would consider and reconcile all the cases in point. It did not.
  • Conner's case has remained under submission for so long because of the need for en banc consideration and because we hoped the supreme court's decision in Economy Inn would consider and reconcile all the cases in point. It did not.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim Gunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.