Jiricko v. Geico Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a five-page, “virtually incomprehensible” statement consisting of “an incoherent, confusing, redundant, [and] defamatory rant” warranted waiver
• holding that a five-page, “virtually incomprehensible” statement consisting of “an incoherent, confusing, redundant, [and] defamatory rant” warranted waiver
• holding that appellant had waived all of his issues on appeal for his failure to comply with Rule 1925(b
• holding that appellant had waived all of his issues on appeal for his failure to comply with Rule 1925(b
• holding that, if an appellant fails to set forth a sufficiency concise and coherent statement in circumstances that suggest bad faith, waiver of all issues may result
• holding appellate courts may sua sponte determine whether issues have been properly preserved on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).