Jiricko v. Coffeyville Memorial Hospital Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that oral communications was not protected from discovery under work-product privilege
• allowing discovery of peer-review activities because “denying [such discovery] would effectively prevent Dr. Jiricko from bringing his lawsuit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).