Skip to main content
· 5/31/2002

JIPAC, NV v. Silas

Citations

  • 800 A.2d 1092
  • 174 Vt. 57
  • 2002 Vt. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing private remedy for statutory violation where offending conduct was plainly within area of Legislature's policy concern, such that denying remedy would seriously undermine intended policy
  • allowing private remedy for statutory violation where offending conduct was plainly within area of Legislature’s policy concern, such that denying remedy would seriously undermine intended policy
  • while statute does not explicitly provide private remedy for particular Act 250 violation, Legislature clearly established direct connection between violation and unenforceability-of-contract remedy
  • while statute does not explicitly provide private remedy for particular Act 250 violation, Legislature clearly established direct connection between violation and unenforceability-of-contract remedy
  • courts will afford relief from illegal contracts “where equity requires it, to the more innocent party even after the agreement has been executed”
  • noting strong environmental protection policy behind Vermont's Act 250

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.