Jing Li v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a transfer of District of Columbia tenancy-by-the-entireties property held by a debtor and his wife to a trust in the wife’s name was not subject to avoidance as a fraudulent transfer
• holding that because the debtor and his wife had no joint creditors, their D.C. tenancy by the entirety property was not subject to the claims of the debtor’s creditors, and the transfer of the property to a trust was not subject to avoidance as a fraudulent transfer
• “Unless stated otherwise, joint tenants . . . are presumed to own their jointly held property in equal undivided interests.”
• “transfers between accounts owned by the Trust to other accounts owned by the Trust cannot be avoided as transfers because dominion and control of the accounts were never relinquished’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).