Jin Zhao v. State University of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the identity of interest exception even though the plaintiff signed a document explicitly stating that she was an employee of the unnamed defendant and received a letter reiterating that fact
• “[B]oth the Supreme Court and the Second Circuit have held that decisions resulting from ‘stereotyped’ impressions or assumptions about the characteristics or abilities of women violate Title VII.”
• “[B]oth the Supreme Court and the Second Circuit have held that decisions resulting from ‘stereotyped’ impressions or assumptions about the characteristics or abilities of women [and men] violate Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).