Skip to main content
· 7/6/2006

Jimoh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Citations

  • 902 A.2d 608
  • 2006 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an issue argued in the brief on appeal, but not raised in the petitioner’s petition for review or fairly comprised therein is waived
  • recognizing that issues not included in a petition for review or fairly comprised therein are waived
  • stating that issues raised in the petition for review but not in the brief are deemed waived
  • noting in dicta that the claimant was not available for work where his work authorization expired and his application for renewal of that authorization was pending
  • “[W]hen a party appeals, but fails to address an issue in the [appellate] brief, the issue is waived.”
  • “[W]hen a party appeals, but fails to address an issue in the brief, the issue is waived. . . . This Court . . . [has] held that an issue raised in the Petition for Review but not addressed in the petitioner’s brief on appeal, was waived[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colins, Jubelirer, McCloskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.