Ninth Circuit· 5/20/2015

Jimmy Yamada v. William Snipes

Citations

786 F.3d 1182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying exacting scrutiny to requirement that political advertisements include disclaimer stating whether they are broadcast or published with approval of a candidate
“nothing in Citizens United suggests that a state may not require disclaimers for political advertising that is not the functional equivalent of a federal electioneering communication”
describing the statute as imposing “only a modest burden on First Amendment rights”
rejecting vagueness challenge to \expenditure\ definition that included \anything of value\
“We therefore join the First, Fourth and Tenth Circuits in holding that the ‘appeal to vote’ language is not unconstitutionally vague.”
see also Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 11-341 (clarifying that the date the statute became effective was the same day the amendment occurred)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Fisher, Watford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.