Jimmy Woodard v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding intent-to-harm standard applied to bystanders’ injuries resulting from high-speed chase of intoxicated driver without mention of subjective belief
• denying a constitutional claim even where suspect testified he “felt terrorized by [the officerj’s aggressive pursuit”
• analyzing whether officer intended to harm fleeing suspect rather than bystander-victims
• further noting that had the officers succeeding in stopping the fleeing suspect, they would have effected a seizure and been subject to a Fourth Amendment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).