Jimmy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a voluntary supervisory conversion by a holding company through a newly-acquired thrift was a merger under 12 U.S.C. § 1729(f)(2)
• finding that the government had “legal authority” to enter into a contract with a holding company under similar facts
• where the holding company, HFI, possessed the legal authority to bind the new thrift, New Hometown, in contract to merge with Old Hometown and receive the specified government assistance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).