Jimmy R. Winn, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a remand is appealable only “when the remand disposes of an important legal issue that would be effectively unreviewable at a later stage of litigation”
• holding that a remand is appealable only “when the remand disposes of an important legal issue that would be effectively unreviewable at a later stage of litigation”
• “[I]f the regulation had been relied upon by the [Veterans Court] in reaching its decision, then ... Winn may have proper standing to challenge its validity before this court.”
• “[R]emand orders from the Veterans Court ordinarily are not appealable because they are not final.”
• specifically holding that 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(c), as it pertains to personality disorder, is a valid exercise of the authority granted to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).