· 3/12/1990
Jimmy R. Trial v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company
Citations
- 896 F.2d 120
- 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2868
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3387
- 1990 WL 15529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A hybrid action brought under the LMRA does not have to join both the employer and the union as defendants; it is sufficient for the employee to sue one or the other, but the employee must prove a cause of action against both.”
- explaining jurisdiction under the Railway Labor Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thornberry, Garwood, Duhé
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.