Jimmy G. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY & CO., Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• resolving that employer’s questions about employee’s age and 18 USCA4 Appeal: 21-2434 Doc: 69 Filed: 06/30/2023 Pg: 19 of 57 retirement plans did not reveal discriminatory intent
• resolving that employer’s questions about employee’s age and 18 USCA4 Appeal: 21-2390 Doc: 76 Filed: 06/30/2023 Pg: 19 of 57 retirement plans did not reveal discriminatory intent
• noting that, in the ADEA context, the fact that an employer did not follow internal termination procedures is not evidence of bias merely because the employee was over forty
• discussing that questions about age and retirement plans did not show a discriminatory intent
• rejecting a claim based only on \[p]roof that an employer did not follow correct or standard procedures in the termination or demotion of an employee\
• rejecting argument that failure to follow termination procedures established pretext under the ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).