Skip to main content
· 11/1/2017

Jimmy Adcock v. Five Star Rentals/Sales, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the distraction theory requires the distraction resulting from the disabled relative must be the determinative factor
  • stating that associational discrimination cases are subject to the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework
  • reversing district court’s decision to dismiss associational claim when employee terminated immediately after he was tardy due to the care requirements of his disabled daughter
  • finding inference of distraction established where plaintiff was told “his problems at home were not the company’s problems” and “he was effectively demoted after he missed a day’s work to care for his daughter [with a disability|”
  • “An employee is qualified if [s]he ‘can perform the essential functions of the employment position.’”
  • “The issue of qualification arises nevertheless because of Kelleher’s request for accommodation, which the ADA does not mandate employers to provide in this context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.