Jimmie Lee Riley v. David T. Kurtz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding § 1997e(d)(2)’s 150% cap includes any attorney’s fees a prisoner incurs defending a monetary judgment on appeal
• holding § 1997e(d)(2)’s 150% cap includes any attorney fees a prisoner incurs defending a monetary judgment on appeal
• explaining the rational bases for including appellate attorney fees within (d)(2)'s 150% cap
• awarding appellate attorney fees for successfully defending a judgment on appeal
• “Statutory interpretation . . . is subject to de novo review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).