Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/25/1952
Jimmerson v. Troy Seed Co.
Citations
- 236 Minn. 395
- 53 N.W.2d 273
- 1952 Minn. LEXIS 669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying parol-evidence rule to exclude proof of consideration other than that necessarily implied by written agreement
- distinguishing the rule permitting evidence of consideration furnished; finding error in trial court’s admission of obligor’s proof that employee made promises other than the necessarily implied promise to make sales needed to earn commissions he sought to recover
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncD.C. Circuit· 1974-10-08· cited 60×
- Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-07-28· cited 50×
- Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-11-24· cited 44×
- The Telex Corporation v. D. E. BalchEighth Circuit· 1967-08-08· cited 26×
- Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-12-29· cited 24×
- State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-01-15· cited 13×
- McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-07-22· cited 8×
- Ross v. StrickerSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1954-10-15· cited 7×
- Darke v. Lurie Besikof Lapidus & Co., LLPD. Minnesota· 2008-02-07· cited 7×
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. HvidstenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-07-10· cited 5×
- Business Credit Leasing, Inc. v. City of BiddefordD. Maine· 1991-07-31· cited 4×
- Lund v. SouthamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-10-10
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wheaton Roller-Mill Co. v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-11-06· cited 29×
- Cargill Commission Co. v. SwartwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-04-04· cited 19×
- Julius Kessler & Co. v. PareliusSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1909-02-26· cited 17×
- Grant v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1912-02-02· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.