Skip to main content
· 4/25/1952

Jimmerson v. Troy Seed Co.

Citations

  • 236 Minn. 395
  • 53 N.W.2d 273
  • 1952 Minn. LEXIS 669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying parol-evidence rule to exclude proof of consideration other than that necessarily implied by written agreement
  • distinguishing the rule permitting evidence of consideration furnished; finding error in trial court’s admission of obligor’s proof that employee made promises other than the necessarily implied promise to make sales needed to earn commissions he sought to recover

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.