Jiminez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proof of sale of morphine, a derivative of opium, not sufficient to sustain an information charging sale of heroin, also a derivative of opium

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sobel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-07-20· cited 56×
• Ramon Duran Guillen v. U.S. Attorney General
  Eleventh Circuit· 2018-12-13· cited 25×
• State v. Ryan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-07· cited 11×
• Atwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-19· cited 8×
• Salas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-09· cited 6×
• Ankiel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-05· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Bill
  California Court of Appeal· 1934-08-13· cited 37×
• Guilbeau v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1923-03-31· cited 23×
• McIntosh v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1924-07-17· cited 9×
• Williams v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1923-11-27· cited 9×
• Coleman v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 1928-05-25· cited 2×